Legal Opinion

City of Buckley v. Burlington Northern Railroad Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1986No. 52593-5PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

The sole issue in this case is whether 43 U.S.C. § 912 (1982) entitles a municipality to receive the United States' reversionary interest in an abandoned railroad right of way granted to a railroad company pursuant to the Northern Pacific Land Grant Act of 1864, if the municipality had not received a patent to the underlying fee. We hold § 912 does entitle a municipality to the federal government's reversionary interest, and that the trial court erred in granting respondent's motion for summary judgment.

I

On July 2, 1864, Congress created the Northern Pacific Railroad Company under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Del Guzzi Constr. Co. v. Global Northwest Ltd., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State of Idaho v. Oregon Short Line R. Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1985
  4. Seybold Mach. Co. v. FeehanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  5. City of Aberdeen v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1984

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Whipps Land & Cattle Co. v. Level 3 Communications, LLCNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  3. City of Maroa v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Keife v. LoganNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Marlow v. MaloneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API