Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CARMAN, Judge:
Defendant, United States, pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rules of this Court, moves for a rehearing of this Court’s opinion and judgment in Slip Op. 86-142 of December 30,1986. While the purpose of a rehearing is not to retry a case, if there has been a fundamental and significant flaw in the conduct of the original proceedings, Rule 59 provides a useful remedy. See W.J. Byrnes & Co. v. United States, 68 Cust.Ct. 358, C.R.D. 72-5 (1972).
Defendant contends the Court misconstrued the terms “log or flitch” as used but not defined in the Tariff Schedules of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richard Nelson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- BMT Commodity Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Arthur J. Humphreys, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Arthur J. Humphreys, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.