Legal Opinion

Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 26, 1987No. Court 81-9-01305PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

CARMAN, Judge:

Defendant, United States, pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rules of this Court, moves for a rehearing of this Court’s opinion and judgment in Slip Op. 86-142 of December 30,1986. While the purpose of a rehearing is not to retry a case, if there has been a fundamental and significant flaw in the conduct of the original proceedings, Rule 59 provides a useful remedy. See W.J. Byrnes & Co. v. United States, 68 Cust.Ct. 358, C.R.D. 72-5 (1972).

Defendant contends the Court misconstrued the terms “log or flitch” as used but not defined in the Tariff Schedules of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richard Nelson Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brookside Veneers, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
  3. BMT Commodity Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  4. Arthur J. Humphreys, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Arthur J. Humphreys, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API