Legal Opinion

State v. Kinkade

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 1, 1950No. 47640PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The errors assigned do not require a description of the alleged acts. Their character as coming within the ban of our statute (section 725.2, Code of 1950) is unquestioned. They were testified to by the child herself, defendant’s stepdaughter, age ten, corroborated in part by her mother’s brother who was an eyewitness from some distance. No serious claim is made that a directed verdict was required. The defendant testified in his own behalf denying the criminal nature of his conduct with his stepdaughter and describing what he claimed did in fact transpire. The sheriff told of admissions made…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. VanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  2. People v. TroutmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  5. People v. HunterMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. PlasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  2. State v. CottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. State v. FolkensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. State v. MaestasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. State v. MunzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API