Legal Opinion

State v. Vance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 8, 1903PublishedCited by 68 opinions

Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hon. O. W. Vermillion, Judge. Deeendant was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of lewdness, and from the sentence imposed appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

Defendant, a dentist, was indicted for indecent exposure of his person in the presence of a young girl, who was in his office for. treatment. Several witnesses whose names were not indorsed on the back of the indictment, were examined on behalf of the state. Notice of intention to introduce this evidence was given the defendant, but the sufficiency of this notice is challenged both as to form and substance. In view of the conclusions reached, we do not deem it necessary to consider these objections. For the purpose of proving that the act was willfully and designedly done, the state was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  3. State v. DesmondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  4. State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. State v. JamisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  2. State v. FettersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. State v. CottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  5. State v. DunneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API