Tatum v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant, Phoebe A. Roberts, from an order of the District Court of Ramsey County, J. J. Egan, J., made April 24, 1894, overruling her demurrer to the complaint. Appeal also by defendant, Nellie C. Roberts, from another order of the same court made at the same time in the same action overruling her separate demurrer to the same complaint.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendant, Phoebe A. Roberts, from an order of the District Court of Ramsey County, J. J. Egan, J., made April 24, 1894, overruling her demurrer to the complaint. Appeal also by defendant, Nellie C. Roberts, from another order of the same court made at the same time in the same action overruling her separate demurrer to the same complaint. The plaintiff, Eleanor Tatum alleged in her complaint among other things that she recovered judgment March 3, 1894, against James O. Roberts in Ramsey County District Court for $1,060.67 and that it was duly docketed. That the cause of action…
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
This was an action brought by a creditor to set aside a conveyance by Ms debtor on the ground that it was made with intent to defraud creditors. The wife of the debtor had joined with her husband in the conveyance. The plaintiff joined as parties defendant to the action the wives of both the grantor and the grantee, each of whom interposed a demurrer to the complaint upon the ground that, as to her, it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
We will first consider the demurrer interposed by Nellie C. Roberts, the wife of the alleged fraudulent grantor James A. Roberts.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Flowers v. GermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Cocker v. CockerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Layne v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Crabbe v. Municipal Savings & Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
- Reiser v. GigrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.