Legal Opinion

Sibert v. Copeland

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1896No. 17,697PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

This was an action in the lower court by the appellee upon a promissory note, executed by the appellants, Albert, B. Sibert and Augustus H. Swearington, and to set □ aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance as against appellants, Clara H. and Albert B. Sibert, who are husband and wife. Other causes against the same parties by other plaintiffs were consolidated with this case in the lower court, and are embraced in this appeal. Upon a trial had, *388judgment was awarded in favor of appellee, and lie was granted the relief which he demanded. The appellants have assigned errors in this court in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Axtel v. ChaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Eichbredt v. AngermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Hanover School Township v. GantIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Starkey v. StarkeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Krause v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. Magel v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Yeoman v. ShaefferIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API