Parks & Woolson MacH. Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
This suit is for the recovery of a tax for 1917 alleged to have been collected by credit at a time when collection was barred by the statute of limitation. Plaintiff claims that an overpayment of tax for 1918 applied on April 24, 1924, as a credit to an additional tax for 1917 assessed in March, 1923, was a collection of the 1917 deficiency out of time; that, the Commissioner having disallowed its claim for refund of the 1917 deficiency, it should have judgment for the prim eipal of the tax so collected .by credit, with interest.
The defendant insists that there was no…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. Boston Buick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
3Cited by14 opinions
- Leisenring v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- First Nat. Bank of Beaver Falls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
- United States v. JaffrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Trumbull Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
- Rosenstadt & Waller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.