Legal Opinion

Parks & Woolson MacH. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 31, 1932No. L-242PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

This suit is for the recovery of a tax for 1917 alleged to have been collected by credit at a time when collection was barred by the statute of limitation. Plaintiff claims that an overpayment of tax for 1918 applied on April 24, 1924, as a credit to an additional tax for 1917 assessed in March, 1923, was a collection of the 1917 deficiency out of time; that, the Commissioner having disallowed its claim for refund of the 1917 deficiency, it should have judgment for the prim eipal of the tax so collected .by credit, with interest.

The defendant insists that there was no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. United States v. Boston Buick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Leisenring v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  2. First Nat. Bank of Beaver Falls v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  3. United States v. JaffrayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  4. Trumbull Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Rosenstadt & Waller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API