Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank of Beaver Falls v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 15, 1934No. K—149PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

A motion for new trial and motion to amend the findings has been filed. It is not claimed that any of the findings were erroneous but it is urged that the findings are incomplete. The additional findings asked, however, either relate to matters that already sufficiently appear from the findings made or to matters that are not material. There is nothing contained in them which would in any way affect the decision in the ease.

While the court is convinced that the former judgment should be sustained, in view of the fact that the point which is specially mentioned in the motion for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lockwood v. . ThorneNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  5. Parks & Woolson MacH. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. A. G. Reeves Steel Const. Co. v. WeissCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Gans S. S. Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. John Gallagher Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  4. American Steam Conveyor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935
  5. Pioneer Coal & Coke Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API