Legal Opinion

Leisenring v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 5, 1933No. L-221PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREEN, Judge.

The plaintiffs are executors of the estate of Daniel B. Wentz, deceased, who died February 8,1926.

This suit is brought upon what the plaintiffs claim to be an account stated for $34,-814.04 due the deceased. The evidence shows that the Commissioner, on May 15, 192,4, signed a schedule of refunds and credits which showed an overpayment of $77,338.94 on the taxes of the deceased for 1919, of which $34,814.04 was credited in the same schedule against that amount of an additional assessment for 1917. The additional tax for 1917 had been assessed in time, but collection was barred by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Newburger-Morris Co. v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Daube v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Daube v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Naumkeag Steam Cotton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  2. Wood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
  3. Isthmian Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
  4. Braun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
  5. Holmes Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API