Legal Opinion

Kareem v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 15, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-1820Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) HUSSAIN KAREEM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-1820 (RWR) ) FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ) CORPORATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. Introduction and Background. Pro se Plaintiff Hussain Kareem sued the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and Johnson & Freedman II, LLC, a law firm, about matters involving foreclosure proceedings on his home mortgage. See Am. Federal Compl., ECF No. 15. The Court dismissed all claims against the FDIC because Plaintiff filed his complaint one day late.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension v. Pittston Company, United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. Rawl Sales & Processing Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Mwabira-Simera v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. United States v. ZaiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API