Legal Opinion
United States v. Mertine
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 4, 1946No. 3567cPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before us on a motion* to dismiss a criminal information filed", against the defendants Lloyd Mertine and Sam Berg, trading under the firm name of Kings Highway Mountain Line. No formal written motion was filed and counsel: agreed that the matter should be submitted: as if formal motion to quash the informa— lion had been filed. Counsel for the defendants incorporated his reasons for his motion in a memorandum handed to the court and that will be filed in lieu of a written motion.
The information is laid under Part II of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- McKelvey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Edwards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cushing v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. GilboyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Universal Milk Bottle Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. LaveryDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.