Legal Opinion

Universal Milk Bottle Service, Inc. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1951No. 11180PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

On September 24,1948, an indictment was returned against appellants, charging them with a conspiracy to raise, fix, and maintain prices for the sale of milk, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1 et seq. The facts alleged in the indictment set forth that the Cincinnati Area, here in question, 'has a population in excess of 650,000 persons, who annually consume more than 175,000,7 000 pounds of milk, for which they pay more than $16,000,000; that more than 40% of the milk sold by distributors in the Cincinnati Area is produced in Kentucky and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. Masonite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Las Vegas Merchant Plumbers Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. Robert A. Mann and Bank of the Southwest, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  3. Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. United States v. PopeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  5. United States v. Ronald Paul BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API