Legal Opinion

L. M. Smith and Earl C. Corey v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 14, 1961No. 17278_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Smith and Corey already are here on an appeal from judgment of conviction of federal crimes. Shortly before argument here, they moved in the district court for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. After submission here (the case is undecided), the district court denied the motions. From the denial of these motions, Smith and Corey now attempt appeals and send their notices forward. The clerk will mark the notices, “lodged, not filed.”

After the motions were filed in the district court, leave should have been sought here under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert A. Frame, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  2. Charles L. Corn v. Guam Coral Company, Inc., Panciteria Far East, Inc. v. Guam Coral Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. The People of the Territory of Guam v. Bobby G. InglettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  4. Canadian Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Peterson Products of San Mateo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Patrick B. Paddock v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API