United States v. Freddie McKinley Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Smith was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He urges reversal on two grounds.
Smith first argues that certain statements which he made to a highway patrol officer should have been excluded because he was not given Miranda warnings prior to his interrogation. The officer stopped the car in which Smith was a passenger for a traffic violation. The officer first questioned the driver, then checked his story with Smith. We stated in Lowe v. United States, 407 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1969):
“The questioning of a driver of a stopped car on an open highway by one policeman, without more,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arnold Lowe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. August Edward Schartner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Louise Orebo and Tom Gore, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. John Joseph MeischCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Leslie Fleishman, United States of America v. Peter Combs, United States of America v. Stephen GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Hunter v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- United States v. Bruce Anthony Collom, United States of America v. Stephen CollomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Richard Bradford v. Walter T. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.