Legal Opinion

United States v. Freddie McKinley Smith

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 28, 1971No. 26637PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Smith was convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He urges reversal on two grounds.

Smith first argues that certain statements which he made to a highway patrol officer should have been excluded because he was not given Miranda warnings prior to his interrogation. The officer stopped the car in which Smith was a passenger for a traffic violation. The officer first questioned the driver, then checked his story with Smith. We stated in Lowe v. United States, 407 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1969):

“The questioning of a driver of a stopped car on an open highway by one policeman, without more,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Arnold Lowe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. August Edward Schartner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  4. Louise Orebo and Tom Gore, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. United States v. John Joseph MeischCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Leslie Fleishman, United States of America v. Peter Combs, United States of America v. Stephen GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Hunter v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. United States v. Bruce Anthony Collom, United States of America v. Stephen CollomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Richard Bradford v. Walter T. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API