Corn Construction Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
A Grand Junction, Colorado, housing project failed to fulfill the hopes of its developers and the resulting financial entanglements are the cause of this suit over which there is federal jurisdiction because of diversity of citizenship. The case was tried without a jury and none of the comprehensive findings of fact made by the court are contested.
No. 6653 is an appeal by Corn Construction Company (Corn) from a denial of its claim based on services rendered and materials furnished by it as a subcontractor to Western States Construction Company (Western) and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- American Surety Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Glades County, Fla. v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Morro Palisades Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of Detroit v. Federal Nat. Bank of ShawneeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Ulery v. Asphalt Paving, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Corn Construction Company v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company of Hartford, Connecticut, an Insurance Company, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company of Hartford, Connecticut v. Lloyd Files, Cordelia E. Files, A. O. Johnson, City of Grand Junction, Colorado, and Columbia Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961