State v. Pressnall
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This is a DUI case. We are asked to determine whether the trial court properly excluded non-forensic evidence of Pressnall’s blood alcohol concentration, which was offered to impeach the results of the breath test admitted against him. We are also asked to examine whether the court erred in instructing the jury on the scientific acceptability of the intoximeter used to test Pressnall’s breath alcohol content. As explained below, we vacate the judgment of conviction and remand the case for a new trial.
The facts are briefly as follows. In the early morning hours of February…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. HartwigIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. KnollIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SantanaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. HarrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. Van SickleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. BarkerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. EdmondsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.