Legal Opinion

Lemon v. BUCHAN LUMBER COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1960No. 536PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

Plaintiff's cause of action is laid in tort and not in contract. The fact alleged and admitted) by the demurrer that defendant, having a contract to deliver yellow pine had in fact delivered a mixture of yellow and white pine gave plaintiff no right of action. The damages, if any, resulting from the breach of contract by delivery of a less valuable article could only be claimed by the purchaser.

Plaintiff, if she is to recover, must allege some breach of duty owing her' intestate by defendants which proximately caused his death. Recognizing this requirement, she -alleges the lumber was sold…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stultz v. Benson Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Hasbrouck v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Rulane Gas Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Gant v. . GantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Wyatt v. North Carolina Equipment CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Swaney v. Peden Steel CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Don Allen Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Douglas v. W. C. Mallison & SonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API