Legal Opinion

Rulane Gas Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1949PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The original plaintiff recovered in ber action against Rulane Gas Company for the injury and wrongful death of ber intestate, and the Gas Company has paid the plaintiff the amount of the judgment. However, Montgomery Ward & Company having been made party defendant, and the allegations in' Rulane Gas Company’s answer and cross-complaint of joint and concurring negligence having been sustained by the verdict and judgment below, Montgomery Ward & Company has appealed from the judgment decreeing contribution, and brings the case here for review.

We note that the case was instituted and tried below…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Harton v. . Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. Marvin R. MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. Seasword v. Hilti, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Willey v. Fyrogas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Kientz v. CarltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Jarosh v. Van MeterNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API