Legal Opinion

Kimberlin v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 7, 1939No. 34,397PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Allen, J.:

This was an action in partition. A demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition was sustained, and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff and defendants claim under the will of Charles M. Hicks, who died October 3,1920. The will provided:

“First: For services rendered me during my lifetime, I give and bequeath to L. C. Ele, for a period of twenty years from the date of my death, the use, rent free, of the following-described real estate (description), L. C. Ele to receive all rentals and royalties which may accrue on account of the production of oil and gas,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Markham v. WatermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Beilstein v. BeilsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Ritchie v. Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. Franck v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hawe v. HaweIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Tomb v. BardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  3. Hale v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Springfield Monarch Insurance v. MorseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Gereke v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API