Legal Opinion

Mahon v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1922No. Appeal, No. 290PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill in equity; plaintiffs, man and wife, asked that defendant, a *494Pennsylvania corporation, be restrained from mining any coal underlying the former’s property in tbe City of Pittston, “tbe removal of which will cause the caving-in, collapse or subsidence of their dwelling house,” contrary to the Act of May 27, 1921, P. L. 1198, commonly known as the Kohler Act.

At the outset, it may be stated that, so far as the contractual rights of the respective parties are concerned, as shown by the paper title to the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Commonwealth v. ZasloffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. DeLuca v. Buckeye Coal CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API