Legal Opinion

Miller & May v. City of Central City

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 11, 1918Published

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

Miller and May for many years were engaged in the saloon business in Central City. On September 28th, 1912, a local option election was held, whereby that territory became dry. Their licenses, however, for that year did not expire until December, at which time they applied for and took out a new license for another twelve months; and, again, on the expiration of the second license they applied for and took out, in December, 1913, a license good until December 5th, 1914. In the meantime the local op*603tion election had been contested by the wets and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watts v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  2. May v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Shehan v. Louisville & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API