Miller & May v. City of Central City
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Sampson
Affirming.
Miller and May for many years were engaged in the saloon business in Central City. On September 28th, 1912, a local option election was held, whereby that territory became dry. Their licenses, however, for that year did not expire until December, at which time they applied for and took out a new license for another twelve months; and, again, on the expiration of the second license they applied for and took out, in December, 1913, a license good until December 5th, 1914. In the meantime the local op*603tion election had been contested by the wets and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Watts v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
- May v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Shehan v. Louisville & N. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907