Legal Opinion

Walden v. Bodley

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1840PublishedCited by 67 opinions

ON dppeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kentucky..

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice M‘LEAN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from the decree of the Circuit Court of Kentucky.

Bodley and others filed their bill in the Circuit Court, representing, that on the 17th of October, 1783, an entry was made in the name of Henry Crutcher and John Tibbs for ten thousand acres of land, as follows: Henry Crutcher and John Tibbs enter ten thousand acres of land on a treasury warrant,- No. 18,747, as tenants in common, beginning at a.large black ash and' small buckeye, marked thus, J. T., on the side of a buffaloe road, leading from the lower Blue Lick, a N. E.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Willison v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Bodley v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  3. Winlock v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1823

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Hughes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  3. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Durant v. Essex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1869
  5. Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API