Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert R. Krilich, Krilich Companies, Incorporated, Riverwoods Development Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 12, 2000No. 99-2271, 99-2397PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
The EPA civilly charged Robert Krilich with illegally filling a wetland on property he was developing in suburban Chicago, Illinois. Krilich entered into a consent decree with the EPA to settle the dispute, the terms of which required him, among other things, to create a substitute wetland by a specific date, or pay a substantial penalty for any delay. He failed to complete the new wetland by the stated time, so the EPA moved to enforce the terms of the consent decree. The district court granted that motion and fined Krilich in excess of $1.2 million. Krilich appealed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Samuel J. Jordon v. John J. GilliganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Pedro Luis Christopher TinocoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Anton TittjungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Orchard Hill Bldg. Co. v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng'rsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Robert R. Krilich, Krilich Companies, Inc., Riverwoods Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.