State v. Mancia-Sandoval
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL E. DANIELSON, Justice.
liAppellant State of Arkansas appeals from the circuit court’s order granting a motion to suppress evidence in favor of appellees Jose Adilio Mancia-Sandoval and Osires Guevara. The State’s sole point on appeal is that, because a pretextual stop is not prohibited by the Arkansas or federal constitutions, the circuit court erred in suppressing evidence discovered following a canine sniff of a vehicle that was validly detained on probable cause. Appellees did not file a response. We agree with the State and reverse and remand.
The record reveals the following facts.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Mings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- State v. K.H.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Rainey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- Cassinelli v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.