Legal Opinion

CITY OF DeQUINCY v. Henry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 9, 2009No. 09-636PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECUIR, Judge.

| |This workers’ compensation appeal was brought by an employer, the City of De-Quincy, after its injured employee, Randy James Henry, successfully mediated a resolution of his third-party tort suit against CLECO Utility Group, Inc. The City sought to terminate all workers’ compensation benefits, including future medical expenses, based on the allegation that Henry failed to obtain written approval of the settlement, thereby invoking the forfeiture provision of the workers’ compensation statute. The trial court denied the City’s motion to terminate benefits, found the City…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Winford v. Conerly Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. Breaux v. Dauterive Hosp. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Henry v. BarlowLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Henry v. BarlowLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of DeQuincy v. HenrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
  2. Kenly v. FullerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Mercer v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Mercer v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. James Mercer v. Nabors Drilling USA, LpLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API