Legal Opinion
Mercer v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 2011No. 10-1092PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
COOKS, Judge.
| ⅜ FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
James Mercer (Mercer) sued a third-party tort feasor for injuries allegedly sustained in a job-related accident. His employer, Nabors Drilling USA, LP, (Na-bors) intervened in the suit. Mercer reached a settlement with the third-party tort feasor for an amount which exceeded the sum owed as reimbursement to Na- bors. It is undisputed that Nabors did not provide express written approval of the settlement. However, Nabors agreed to the amount it was to be paid as reimbursement for compensation payments and medical payments, and agreed to deduct from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Brooks v. ChicolaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Fontenot v. Hanover Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- City of DeQuincy v. HenrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
- Darbonne v. M&M Right of Way ContractorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mercer v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012