Legal Opinion

City of DeQuincy v. Henry

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 2011No. 2010-C-0070PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Justice. *

|, We granted this application to determine whether the courts below erred in deciding that an employer had approved in writing a compromise between an employee and a third-party, and that the employer was not entitled to a credit toward the employee’s future medical costs, all as described in Louisiana Revised Statutes 23:1102. For the reasons set forth below, we find that the issue of whether or not the City had given written approval of the settlement need not be resolved, but that the courts below did, in fact, err in ruling that the employer was not entitled to a credit…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet MetalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. BondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. In Re Succession of BoyterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. Stogner v. StognerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Arabie v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  2. Tracie F. v. Francisco D.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2016
  3. Credit v. Richland Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
  4. Latiolais v. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Vizzi v. Lafayette City-Parish Consolidated GovernmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API