Legal Opinion
Claim of Nomikos v. Ionic Painting Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 9, 2006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 4, 2004, which, inter alia, denied the employer’s request for further development of the record.
Claimant injured his back while working for Ionic Painting Corporation in November 2000. The State Insurance Fund (hereinafter SIF) filed a C-7 form in February 2001 raising several issues, including the contention that its coverage had been canceled by Ionic in January 2000. Several hearings ensued and Peter Vangelotos, Ionic’s president, received notice of hearings by certified mail and was subpoenaed to appear at the March…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Reillo v. Energy Saver Insulation Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Romano v. New York City Department of CorrectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Patel v. Tal Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Garifo v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Jolley v. Ind-Venture Communications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Min Kang v. Ameasia Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Swanko v. Darlind ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Swanko v. Darlind ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013