State v. Anderson

The majority not only holds that defendant can challenge his restitution on direct appeal despite his guilty *421plea, but also goes on to overrule three of our recent cases: State v. Ross, 108 Or App 560, 815 P2d 719 (1991); State v. King, 107 Or App 249, 810 P2d 413, rev den 312 Or 151 (1991); State v. Peters, 104 Or App 582, 801 P2d 904 (1990). It does that because it assumes that State v. Bateman, 95 Or App 456, 771 P2d 314, rev den 308 Or 197 (1989), has been legislatively superseded by the 1989 amendments to ORS 138.050.1 believe Bateman, Peters, King and Ross are all still good law.…