State v. Sherrod
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
Jamel Sherrod (defendant) appeals from a judgment revoking his probation for being in possession of an “explosive device.” Because we hold that firearm ammunition alone is not an “explosive device” as connoted in North Carolina General Statute 15A-1343(b)(5), we reverse defendant’s conviction.
Facts
Defendant pled guilty to possessing cocaine with intent to sell or deliver on 11 December 2006 and was given a suspended sentence of ten to twelve months on condition that he satisfy the terms of his probation for thirty-six months. As a special condition, defendant was sentenced to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. HewettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Abernethy v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. TennantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BareCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Swauger v. Univ. of N.C. at CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Falin v. Roberts Co. Field Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Purcell v. Friday StaffingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.