Falin v. Roberts Co. Field Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
*144 Where the Full Commission did not err in concluding that employment offered to plaintiff was not suitable pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 97-2(22), we affirm the Opinion and Award of the Full Commission.
In October of 2012, Franklin Falin, plaintiff, a resident of Kingsport, Tennessee, sought and accepted a construction job with The Roberts Company Field Services, Inc., defendant, specifically seeking work as an iron worker. The project plaintiff would work on was in Aurora, *145 North Carolina, over 415 miles from his home. On his application dated 15 October 2012, plaintiff indicated…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. BeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
- Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winkler v. N.C. State Bd. of PlumbingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Ballock v. CostlowDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2019
- Ballock v. CostlowDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2019
- Owens v. The City Of PennsboroDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2021
- Smith v. The City of PennsboroDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.