Legal Opinion

Falin v. Roberts Co. Field Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 2016No. 15-565PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*144 Where the Full Commission did not err in concluding that employment offered to plaintiff was not suitable pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 97-2(22), we affirm the Opinion and Award of the Full Commission.

In October of 2012, Franklin Falin, plaintiff, a resident of Kingsport, Tennessee, sought and accepted a construction job with The Roberts Company Field Services, Inc., defendant, specifically seeking work as an iron worker. The project plaintiff would work on was in Aurora, *145 North Carolina, over 415 miles from his home. On his application dated 15 October 2012, plaintiff indicated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Anderson v. LINCOLN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. BeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  5. Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Winkler v. N.C. State Bd. of PlumbingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Ballock v. CostlowDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2019
  3. Ballock v. CostlowDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2019
  4. Owens v. The City Of PennsboroDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2021
  5. Smith v. The City of PennsboroDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API