Legal Opinion

Roe v. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1998No. 97-16326PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

134 F.3d 1400

67 USLW 3682, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 708,

98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 981

Brenda ROE and Anna Doe, on behalf of themselves and all

others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

Eloise ANDERSON, Director of the California Department of

Social Services; California Department of Social Services;

Pete Wilson, Governor of the State of California; Craig

Brown, Director of the California Department of Finance,

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 97-16326.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 11, 1997.

Decided Jan. 28, 1998.

Theodore Garelis, Deputy Attorney General,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Zobel v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bay Area Addiction Research & Treatment, Inc. v. City of AntiochCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Children of the Rosary v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Dearcey Stewart v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Rucker v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Maldonado v. HoustounCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API