Legal Opinion
Schachter v. Whalen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 7, 1978No. 78 Civ. 368 (CHT)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
TENNEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Michael B. Schachter, M.D., a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State of New York, and John Doe, Richard Roe and Mary Moe, anonymous individuals who are alleged to be Dr. Schachter’s patients, bring this civil rights action seeking both a declaration that Sections 230(10)(k) and (7) of the New York Public Health Law are unconstitutional and an injunction against further enforcement of those statutory provisions. 1 Now before this Court is the plaintiffs’ application for a preliminary injunction. Because the Court concludes, for the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Huffman v. Pursue, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Juidice v. VailSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Williams v. Red Bank Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- McDonald v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Division of Metropolitan Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Alma Society Inc. v. MellonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Williams v. Red Bank Board Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.