Legal Opinion
Orris v. Sullivan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 1, 1992No. Nos. 91-15405, 91-15485PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, Circuit Judge:
This case, which consolidates two cross-appeals from the district court's rulings on three cross-motions for summary judgment, arises out of a challenge to a determination made by the State of Hawaii’s Department of Human Services that, because an AFDC1 recipient’s son and the son's natural father were to be included in the recipient’s household for AFDC purposes, the natural father’s disability income, which exceeded the Department’s “standard of need” level for a family of five, rendered the household ineligible for receipt of further AFDC benefits. We affirm in part,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sullivan v. StroopSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bowen v. GilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sullivan v. EverhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gorrie v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Ruby Oliver v. James G. LedbetterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buening v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
- Tigner v. Secretary, Cabinet for Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993
- Angela Orris v. Louis W. Sullivan, Dr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Third-Party v. Winona E. Rubin, Director, Department of Human Services, State of Hawaii, Defendant-Third-Party Angela Orris v. Louis W. Sullivan, Dr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Third-Party v. Winona E. Rubin, Director, Department of Human Services, State of Hawaii, Defendant-Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992