Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Everhart

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 21, 1990No. 88-1323PublishedCited by 210 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

If the Secretary of Health and Human Services determines that & beneficiary has received “more or less than the correct *85amount of payment,” the Social Security Act requires him to effect “proper adjustment or recovery,” subject to certain restrictions in the case of overpayments. This case requires us to decide whether the Secretary’s so-called “netting” regulations, under which he calculates the difference between past underpayments and past overpayments, are merely a permissible method of determining whether “more or less than the correct amount of payment” was made, or are instead, as to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by210 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API