Legal Opinion

Lanman Lithotech, Inc. v. Gurwitz

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 7, 1985No. 85-1243PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

478 So.2d 425 (1985)

LANMAN LITHOTECH, INC., Etc., et al., Petitioners,

v.

Stanley GURWITZ, et al., Respondents.

No. 85-1243.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 7, 1985.

Harlan Tuck of Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, for petitioners.

Jeffrey Allen Tew and Robert B. Galt III, of Kirkpatrick & Lockhart, Miami, for respondents.

COWART, Judge.

Two main issues are presented in this petition for writ of common law certiorari. The first is whether the right to jury trial exists in a shareholder's derivative action. The second is whether punitive damages are recoverable in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Dudley v. Harrison, McCready & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  4. Finance, Inv. and Rediscount Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Rankin v. Frebank Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Weltzin v. NailSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. SE Property Holdings, LLC v. Neverve LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
  3. Head v. LaneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Darr v. Marine Electronics Solutions, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Chemplex Florida v. NorelliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API