Legal Opinion

Boyer v. Champeny

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1928No. 27,874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.;

This is an appeal from a survey made by the county surveyor on notice, as provided by R. S. 19-1423 et seq. The facts disclosed by the record are substantially as follows: The Arkansas river flows in a direction a little east of south through section 36, township 31 south, range 2 east, in Sumner county. Nearly half a mile north of the south line of the section the river divides into two channels, forming an island between them. This island, or the part here in question at least, is described on the government survey as lot 11, island No. 1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Swarz v. RamalaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  3. Terrell v. ChessmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wagner v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  2. Boyer v. ChampenySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Eidson v. PalmquistSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API