Legal Opinion

Gayton v. Department of Highways

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1962No. 19695PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McWilliams

In response to Gayton’s complaint the Department of Highways, State of Colorado, hereinafter referred to as the Highway Department, filed a motion to dismiss, averring “that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” The motion was granted and a judgment of dismissal was duly entered, Gayton electing to stand on her complaint. By writ of error Gayton now seeks reversal of this judgment of dismissal, contending that her complaint as drawn is legally sufficient to withstand this motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Accordingly it becomes necessary to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. SymonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Beals v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. v. BucsiOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gilbert v. Greeley, S. L. & P. R'y Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  5. Dillinger v. North Sterling Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Espinoza v. O'DELLSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. McDonald v. Lakewood Country ClubSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. Troiano v. Colorado Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API