Legal Opinion

West v. Broadwell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1928No. 2878PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is pending on motion to dismiss on the same ground as the companion case of the same title this day decided {ante, p. 652). The only difference is that this is an action to recover the possession of personal property while the other action' was to recover possession of real prop erty. Both actions arose ont of the same contract between the parties litigant.

For the reasons assigned in the companion case the motion to dismiss is allowed.

Appeal Dismissed.

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Cottrell Et Ux. v. Prier Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Graf v. Don Rasmussen Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Commercial Service Corp. v. L. Paulle-Midway Fixture & Show Case Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Heider v. UnicumeOregon Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API