Legal Opinion

In Re Cattell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1945No. 30330PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

The questions in this case have been presented piecemeal. We are here confronted with á decisive question which was not raised in or passed upon by the trial court. If this question were not such as goes to the jurisdiction of the Common Pleas Court and especially a question involving personal liberty, the judgment of the Court of Appeals would be affirmed on the questions presented to that court. Board of County Commrs. of Mercer County v. Deitsch, 94 Ohio St., 1, 113 N. E., 745. Cf. Kimball v. Kimball Bros., Inc., 143 Ohio St., 500, 56 N. E. (2d), 60; 2 Ohio Jurisprudence, 613, Section 570.

A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SayreSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Board of Commissioners v. DeitschOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Kimball v. Kimball Bros.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Handley v. McCallOhio Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. CraftOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Bellows v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. State ex rel. Stefanick v. Municipal Court of MariettaOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Delli Venneri v. Delli VenneriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. General Expressways, Inc. v. Iowa Reciprocity BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API