Legal Opinion
Albertson's, Inc. v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 10, 1973No. Civ. A. No. C-11-71PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, District Judge,
under designation.
The plaintiffs in this case, Albert-son’s, Inc., a retail grocery chain, Spud-nut Industries, Inc., a manufacturer of doughnuts and pastries, and Fisher Baking Company, a food processor who has ceased all operations, filed a complaint in their own behalf as sugar purchasers, as well as in a representative capacity for all persons and concerns similarly situated. Compensation is sought from two beet sugar manufacturers, The Amalgamated Sugar Company (TASCO) and Utah-Idaho Sugar Company (U-I), for damages caused by alleged antitrust…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Trade Commission v. Cement InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Freedman v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Yoder Bros. v. California-Florida Plant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Albertson's, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. The Amalgamated Sugar Company, a Utah Corporation, and Utah-Idaho Sugar Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- In re Plywood Anti-trust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
- Societe Generale De Banque v. Touche Ross & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.