Picaso v. Tucson Unified School District
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this wrongful death action, appellants Juan and Maribel Picaso challenge the trial court’s decision regarding the admission into evidence and preclusive effect of Maribel’s guilty plea to misdemeanor child abuse based on the events that led to this action. The Picasos argue the trial court erred by applying A.R.S. § 13-807 to this case, apply ing collateral estoppel (issue preclusion), and admitting evidence of the guilty plea. Because we find the trial court erred by ruling that Maribel’s guilty plea precluded her from contradicting any issues involved…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Chaney Building Co. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Twin City Fire Insurance v. BurkeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradley Ventures, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
- Picaso v. Tucson Unified School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Williams v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007