Legal Opinion

Williams v. Baugh

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 20, 2007No. 2 CA-CV-2006-0128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Appellant/defendant Jaydon Baugh challenges the trial court’s finding that he was liable to appellee/plaintiff Royce Williams as a matter of law and granting summary judgment in favor of Williams on the issue of liability in Williams’s assault action. Baugh argues that A.R.S. § 13-807, which prohibits a defendant convicted in a criminal case from denying the essential allegations of the criminal conviction in a subsequent civil ease, does not bar him from raising the affirmative defenses of justification, contributory negligence, and comparative fault.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Link v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McMurtry v. Weatherford Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. Messina v. MIDWAY CHEVROLET CO.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. American Automobile Insurance Company v. CernyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  4. Wilshire Insurance Company v. YagerDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API