Legal Opinion

Smith v. Amiss

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1903No. 4,292PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Huntington Circuit Court; J. G. Branyan, Judge. Action by Joseph G-. Amiss against Mahlon F. Smith. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Appellee recovered a.judgment against appellant on certain notes. Appellant’s second paragraph of amended answer to which a demurrer was sustained, contained substantially the same facts as his cross-complaint, to which a demurrer was overruled. The court found the facts specially. No attempt has been made to bring the evidence into the record.

*531Appellee and others interested in establishing a factory at the city of Huntington platted adjoining land into town lots. This land was separated from the termini of certain streets in the city by an unplatted tract about forty rods wide over which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Burkett v. HolmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Krutz v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Shattuck v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carr v. DuhmeIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Walb v. EshelmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Huffman v. State ex rel. BartonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Hercules Torpedo Co. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Stockton v. HamIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API