State v. Binnarr
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty
Zeb Eron Binnarr (“Petitioner”) was convicted by a jury for failing to timely register as a sex offender pursuant to section 23-3-4601 of the South Carolina Code. Petitioner appealed his conviction primarily on the ground that he did not receive actual notice of a change in the law regarding sex offender registration requirements. The Court of Appeals affirmed Petitioner’s conviction. State v. Binnar, Op. No.2010-UP-077 (S.C. Ct.App. filed Feb. 2, 2010). This Court granted Petitioner’s request for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals. We reverse.
I.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
- Tant v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014