Legal Opinion

State v. Binnarr

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 9, 2012No. 27122PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Beatty

Zeb Eron Binnarr (“Petitioner”) was convicted by a jury for failing to timely register as a sex offender pursuant to section 23-3-4601 of the South Carolina Code. Petitioner appealed his conviction primarily on the ground that he did not receive actual notice of a change in the law regarding sex offender registration requirements. The Court of Appeals affirmed Petitioner’s conviction. State v. Binnar, Op. No.2010-UP-077 (S.C. Ct.App. filed Feb. 2, 2010). This Court granted Petitioner’s request for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Court of Appeals. We reverse.

I.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. Tant v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API