Legal Opinion

Tant v. South Carolina Department of Corrections

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 28, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2012-206988; No. 27392PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hearn

This case calls upon us to consider the authority of the Department of Corrections to alter its initial determination as to the length of an inmate’s sentence. Following his conviction for one count of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (ABHAN), one count of possession of a dangerous animal, and multiple counts of animal fighting, David Tant was remanded to the Department of Corrections. Upon receipt of his sentencing sheets, the Department recorded his sentence as fifteen years’ imprisonment. However, the Department later determined the judge intended to sentence Tant to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. State v. DeAngelisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bordeaux v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API