Legal Opinion
Tennessee Ex Rel. City of Cookville v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership Corp.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 26, 2003No. 2:02-0093PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, Senior District Judge.
On July 31, 2001, the City of Cookeville Department of Electricity (“Cookeville” or “Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court for Putnam County, Tennessee, seeking to condemn Upper Cumberland Electric Membership Corporation’s (“UCEMC”) facilities and service rights within five areas recently annexed by Cookeville. In order to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-16-106, which requires that all parties having any interest in the land or rights involved in an eminent domain case be made defendants, Cookeville added as defendants the federal Rural…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pamela Caver v. Central Alabama Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- City of Cookeville, Tennessee v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- City of Cookeville v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Montara Water & Sanitary District v. County of San MateoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.