Legal Opinion
Pacific Caisson & Shoring v. Bernards Bros. CA2/3
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 19, 2015No. B248320PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
INTRODUCTION
The Contractors’ State License Board (the Board) suspended the license of Pacific Caisson & Shoring, Inc. (Pacific), as the sanction for the failure to notify the Board that a judgment had been entered against Pacific. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 7071.17.) Thereafter, the trial court found that Pacific did not substantially comply with the requirement that the contractor be licensed while performing work. (§ 7031, subd. (e).) Pacific appeals contending that the judgment was not “substantially related” to its “construction activities” within the meaning of section…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis WaterparkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Alatriste v. Cesar's Exterior Designs, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Construction Financial v. Perlite Plastering Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rubio v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- C.W. Johnson & Sons, Inc. v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Southern Cal. Pizza Co., LLC v. Certain Underwriters, etc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
- West Pacific Electric Company Corporation v. Dragados/FlatironDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021