Legal Opinion
Amsterdam Tobacco Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 17, 2000No. 98 Civ. 3934(RMB)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BERMAN, District Judge.
Amsterdam Tobacco Incorporated (“Amsterdam”), Boro Park Tobacco Company, Incorporated, The Koger Company, Incorporated, Queens Tobacco, Grocery & Candy Company, Incorporated, S/A Cigarette Company, Incorporated, and Sunrise Candy & Tobacco Corporation (collectively “Plaintiffs”) filed this action on or about December 1, 1998, against Philip Morris Incorporated (“Philip Morris” or “Defendant”) seeking $312,000,000.00 in damages for Philip Morris’ alleged role in a cigarette smuggling enterprise operating from Virginia to New York. Amsterdam has brought this action…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Empire Merchants, LLC v. Reliable Churchill LLLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- In Re Mastercard International Inc., Internet Gambling LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2001
- World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Dubai Islamic Bank v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Bd. of Managers of Trump Tower at City Ctr. Condo. v. PalazzoloDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.