Legal Opinion

Weinrob v. Heintz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 25, 1952No. Gen. 45,357PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Burke

delivered the opinion of the court.

Alec Weinrob, a Chicago lawyer filed a complaint in the superior court of Cook county against James Heintz, alleging negligence in the operation by defendant of his motor vehicle on March 25,1947, while plaintiff was a passenger at the request of defendant for the purpose of transacting business for defendant, as the proximate result of which plaintiff was injured. AnSAvering, defendant denied the material allegations of the complaint and in an amendment alleged that at the time of the occurrence plaintiff was on a business trip…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brant v. Chicago & Alton RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Connett v. WingetIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. The People v. CohenIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Hanson v. Trust Co. of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Miller v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1946

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. HarclaonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Agranoff v. MortonWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Hall v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  4. Flight Kitchen, Inc. v. Chicago Seven-Up Bottling Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  5. Biggerstaff v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis R.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API